翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Polar Tankers v. City of Valdez : ウィキペディア英語版
Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez

''Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez'' was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2009, involving the tonnage clause of the United States Constitution.
The City of Valdez in Alaska imposed a property tax that, in practice, applied only to large oil tankers. Polar Tankers, a ConocoPhillips subsidiary, sued, arguing that the tax violated the Tonnage Clause of the Constitution, which forbids a state, "without the Consent of Congress, () lay any Duty of Tonnage."
The Supreme Court agreed with Polar Tankers. The court noted that the original meaning of the clause was as a term of art for a tax imposed that varies with "the internal cubic capacity of a vessel," but emphasized that a consistent line of cases had read the clause broadly, "forbidding a State to do that indirectly which she is forbidden ... to do directly."〔Slip op. at _ (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting ''Passenger Cases'', 7 How. 283, 458 (1849)).〕 Those cases, the court concluded, stood for the proposition that the tonnage clause's prohibition reaches any taxes or duties on a ship, "whether a fixed sum upon its whole tonnage, or a sum to be ascertained by comparing the amount of tonnage with the rate of duty() ... regardless of (tax or duty's ) name or form ... which operate to impose a charge for the privilege of entering, trading in, or lying in a port.”〔Id. at _ (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting ''Steamship Co. v. Portwardens'', 6 Wall. 31, 35 (1867), and ''Clyde Mallory Lines v. Alabama ex rel. State Docks Comm’n'', 296 U. S. 261, 265-6 (1935)).〕
With this premise in mind, the court concluded that because Valdez taxes "ships and to no other property at all() ... in order to obtain revenue for general city purposes(this was ) ... the kind of tax that the Tonnage Clause forbids Valdez to impose without the consent of Congress, consent that Valdez lacks."
==See also==

* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 557
* List of United States Supreme Court cases

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.